It seems, Microsoft It is necessary to defend their interests not only in the claim from the US Federal Trade Commission. Axios portal reports that a group of ten gamers went to the California court in an attempt to stop the deal between Microsoft And Activision Blizzard.
According to Axios, the document contains information about the platforms played by the authors of the complaint. Most of the Xbox does not own, and some of the plaintiffs spend time only for PlayStation.
Most often, within the framework of the transaction, they discuss the potential departure of the Call of Duty with PlayStation after AB loses independence. Xbox states that this is not in her interests.
According to Daniel Crane (Daniel Crane), an expert on antitrust laws and professor of the Faculty of Law of Michigan University, the public is able to prevent the merger of companies, but such claims rarely apply to state claims.
The Federal Trade Commission has already filed a lawsuit to challenge the transaction between Microsoft And Activision Blizzard, Therefore, to be honest, I do not understand why these gamers spend money in order to make a lawsuit on their own.
Daniel Crane
Recall that the antimonopoly services of different countries, one after another, gave green light a purchase Activision Blizzard, but the braid on the stone still found. At the moment, the deal is being studied intently in the USA, Great Britain and the European Union. The regulators of the three regions believe that the absorption will have a negative impact on the industry.
December 21, 2022 The “Conquest” mode for Dune: Spice Wars will be released earlier
December 21, 2022 Announcement Risk of Rain Returns – a remake of a cult "pants" for PC and Switch
The best comments
Ordinary people protect multi -billion dollar corporations, smacks of high ICQ.
For example, after the transaction, prices for interactive entertainment may rise, the number of innovations will decrease, the choice for customers will narrow, and other negative effects will come up
To be honest, all this https://mrslotycasino.co.uk/ publishers can implement, regardless of whether the transaction will close or break off))
> After the transaction, prices for interactive entertainment may rise, the number of innovations will decrease, the choice for customers will be narrowed, and other negative effects will come up
Maybe not. A lawsuit based on fear and anxiety? Well good luck to them
Soniboi (not to be confused with adequate owners of platforms that simply enjoy games): “Yee, we have the best exclusives on the platform, they don’t let out this way, only high-budget ligned events and only here”
Also they: “Oh, you can’t buy it, this will reduce competition, and will not let us play games that the competitor will have the rights to, these games can become more expensive (we have exclusives, they have expensive production, this is different and generally impossible”.
Firstly, there is also competition between corporations.
Secondly, okay … before the absorption of Act-Glizard, a beautiful, client-oriented company? They pierced the bottom at the bottom, despite all the competition. And now there is a non -illusory chance that this sharashka will grind there, having expelled effective managers into the frost. They can also add the whole sorcerer to pass. Both in the first and in the second case, the players will only benefit from this.
Cyberpank as a quality mark, well, yes 🙂
Nafig, and most importantly, why?
10 Soniboev also decided to bomb in court, simultaneously trying to give out their undermined asses for the tragedy of the whole game. Her by God, prices can rise without this transaction, indie developers, not large companies, but as to innovation, are given the most diverse choice today, but they have been gone for a long time, only all a trifle that only a person will call with an innovation to which do not do in life at all in life.
But we all know that the whole bombing because of sonboys afraid to lose a banal boring shooter, which is riveted like EA FIFA.
In this particular case, the multi-billion dollar corporations are just the same, and not protect.
But even if they were protected, I don’t see any problems here. People protect not multi -billion dollar corporations, but their own interests as buyers. Because usually it is the multi -billion dollar corporation that can provide them with the best product. Accordingly, they are interested in their well -being. High IQ is not necessary to understand this.
And in general it is better to avoid this position “All fools, and I am d’Artagnan. People are far from as stupid as it seems to many.
Ok, you liked it and this is the main thing, without sarcasm, play pleasure.
However, you yourself say below that the corporations are offered, and we vote by the ruble – and it turns out you just voted for the extremely terrible state of the game on launch and for quite some time after.
It is especially funny now to hear about price raising.
A stick about the two -edges, if successful, you can get a momentary profit, but in the future the winning company may begin to buckle up. And the interests of corporations rarely coincide with the interests of the consumer, so the competition is excellent.
Sonya bought a studio, T -shirts gave money for the game – you feel the difference?
This is what reality? In my reality, multi-billion dollar corporations make a bunch of raw conveyor games for which you need to buy 2000dles (I’m not talking specifically)
Sonya and without any such transactions were the first to raise the prices for Nekstgen and introduced a “tax” to Nekstgen in the person of 10 dollars appgractions.
No, here out of sports interest I want to cheer for the shirts so that they bent all of them = 3
Such a yuavity that the 10th just borrowed money. The same s*ny. Otherwise, why should they spend their money on the lawsuit, the matter is not cheap, and the money back is not returned with failure.